Contract Claims, Requests for Equitable Adjustment, and Contract Termination Matters

Even when federal agencies and contractors have the best of intentions, disagreements can arise over performance obligations. At times, the ambiguity of contract language or unexpected circumstances can lead to differing views of what a contract requires. Other times, federal agencies may have a need to modify the scope of work, and disagreements arise over proper compensation for added or altered work.

Federal government contracts employ a specialized framework for resolving such matters. While providing contractors with considerable rights when properly navigated, the system also contains a number of traps for the uninitiated.

Additionally, contract termination, whether a termination for cause or convenience, is a major event for a government contractor, with both immediate and long-term consequences. Understanding all available options is important in such circumstances.

From contract interpretation to requests for equitable adjustment, formal contract claims (including subcontractor sponsored or “pass-through” claims), and, if necessary, litigation before boards of contract appeals or the Court of Federal Claims, our attorneys can assist.

Representative Experience:

Successfully assisted District of Columbia health care government contractor in obtaining reimbursement of the cost of implementing a prescribed software system as part of a government initiative to improve shared patient information. The government agency added the requirement through a mid-performance unilateral contract modification.
Representation of a Maritime Administration contractor in a payment dispute.
From prior government experience, regularly advised contracting officers on contract modifications and resulting requests for equitable adjustment and contract claims.

Practice Leader — Scott S. Sheffler

Partner

“Regardless of mission, understanding the strings that attach to federal funds is necessary to a grantee's long-term success.”